Registro

Rúbrica para evaluar la consistencia curricular en el aprendizaje significativo

Quintero, Maria Alejandra; De Leon, Nadia; Leon, Mariana; Fernandez, Beatriz; Montecinos, Carmen; Acosta, Ricardo

Rubric for evaluating curricular consistency in meaningful learning




Autores Quintero, Maria Alejandra
Autores De Leon, Nadia
Autores Leon, Mariana
Autores Fernandez, Beatriz
Autores Montecinos, Carmen
Autores Acosta, Ricardo

Tema Curriculum consistency
Tema Active learning
Tema Educational assessment
Tema Significant learning
Tema Teacher education
Tema Aprendizaje significativo
Tema Aprendizaje activo
Tema Consistencia curricular
Tema Evaluación educativa
Tema Formación docente

Descripción This study presented a curricular evaluation rubric based on Fink’s (2003) taxonomy of significant learning as a framework for teaching in higher education. The rubric allowed for the assessment of alignment between learning objectives and teaching strategies, as well as the quality of active and significant learning. Eleven courses from pedagogical and didactic areas of a Bachelor’s Degree in Primary Education in Panama were analyzed. Results showed a medium level of significant learning, characterized by partial active learning, limited deep reflection, and gaps in curricular coherence. The study concluded that the rubric is a useful tool for identifying strengths and weaknesses in curricular design and for improving the quality of teacher education.
 
Descripción Este estudio presentó una rúbrica de evaluación curricular basada en la taxonomía de aprendizaje significativo de Fink (2003) como marco de referencia para la enseñanza en educación superior. La rúbrica permitió evaluar la consistencia entre los objetivos de aprendizaje y las estrategias de enseñanza, así como la calidad del aprendizaje activo y significativo. Se analizaron once asignaturas de las áreas pedagógicas y didácticas de una Licenciatura en Educación Primaria en Panamá. Los resultados evidenciaron un nivel medio de aprendizaje significativo, caracterizado por la presencia parcial de aprendizaje activo, una reflexión profunda limitada y brechas en la coherencia curricular. Se concluyó que la rúbrica constituye una herramienta útil para identificar fortalezas y debilidades en el diseño curricular, contribuyendo al mejoramiento de la calidad educativa y a la formación docente en educación superior.

Editorial Universidad Metropolitana de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología

Fecha 2026-06-30

Tipo info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Tipo info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Formato application/pdf
Formato application/epub+zip

Identificador https://revistas.umecit.edu.pa/index.php/oratores/article/view/2163
Identificador 10.37594/oratores.n24.2163

Fuente Oratores Journal; No. 24 (2026): ORATORES June - November 2026; 57-90
Fuente Revista Oratores; Núm. 24 (2026): ORATORES Junio - Noviembre 2026; 57-90
Fuente 2644-3988
Fuente 2410-8928
Fuente 10.37594/oratores.n24

Idioma spa

Relación https://revistas.umecit.edu.pa/index.php/oratores/article/view/2163/3054
Relación https://revistas.umecit.edu.pa/index.php/oratores/article/view/2163/3055
Relación Allen, John David. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(5), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.5.218-223
Relación Barr, Robert. B., & Tagg, John. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(6), 12-26.
Relación Biggs, John, & Tang, Catherine. (2015). Constructive alignment: An outcomes-based approach to teaching anatomy. In L. K. Chan & W. Pawlina (Eds.), Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide (pp. 31–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_4
Relación Biggs, John, Tang, Catherine, & Kennedy, Gavin. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university. Teaching for Quality Learning at University.
Relación Bonwell, Charles. C., & Eison, James. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183.
Relación Cervantes, José Luis A., Romero, Edgar L. B., Calberto, Luis I. M., & Peralta, Sandra R. T. (2023). Estrategias de enseñanza para el mejoramiento de la práctica docente en Latinoamérica. Revisión sistemática. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(2), 3069-3087
Relación Duchastel, Pierre C., & Merrill, Paul F. (1973). The effects of behavioral Objectives on Learning: A Review of Empirical Studies1. 43(1). Fallahi, Carolyn R. (2008). Redesign of a Life Span Development Course Using Fink’s Taxonomy. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802289906
Relación Fink, L. Dee. (2003). A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning. University of Oklahoma, 27(11), 1–33.
Relación Fink, L. Dee. (2003b). What is significant learning. University of Oklahoma Significant Learning Website. https://www.wcu.edu/Webfiles/PDFs/facultycenter_SignificantLearning.pdf
Relación GGatica, Francisco, & Valenzuela, Juan Pablo. (2025). América latina estancada en la mejora escolar. Resultados de la Prueba ERCE y Factores que Influyen en el Logro Educativo en la Última Década. REICE: Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 23(2), 1-23.
Relación Hammerness, Karen, & Klette, Kirsti. (2015). Indicators of quality in teacher education: Looking at features of teacher education from an international perspective. In Promoting and sustaining a quality teacher workforce (pp. 239-277). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Relación Hoic-Bozic, Nada, Mornar, Vedran, & Boticki, Ivica. (2009). A Blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.914945
Relación Hollowell, Geoffrey P., Brooks, Rebecca M., & Anderson, Yvonne B. (2017). Course design, quality matters training, and student outcomes. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1301144
Relación Khalil, Mohammed K., & Elkhider, Ismail A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Relación Kim, Mi-Young, & Wilkinson, Ian A. G. (2023). Teacher learning through dialogue with colleagues, self and students. Educational Research, 65(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2023.2192226
Relación Koper, Rob, & Olivier, Bill. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
Relación Koper, Rob, & Olivier, Bill. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97-111.
Relación Lea, Mary R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230
Relación Lipnevich, Anastasiya A., Panadero, Ernesto, Gjicali, Krist, & Fraile, Javier. (2021). What’s on the syllabus? An analysis of assessment criteria in first year courses across US and Spanish universities. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(4), 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09357-9
Relación Mager, Robert F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives (Vol. 962). Palo Alto, California: Fearon Publishers.
Relación Maher, Anthony (2004). Learning outcomes in higher education: Implications for curriculum design and student learning. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 3(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.32.78
Relación Martens, Kate S. R. (2018). Rubrics in program evaluation. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 18(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X17753961
Relación Quintero, María C. C., & Ordoñez, Edgar J. (2021). Formación del profesorado en Latinoamérica. Revista de ciencias sociales, 27(2), 284-295
Relación Richmond, Gerald, Bartell, Tina, Carter Andrews, Dorinda J., & Neville, Meredith L. (2019). Reexamining coherence in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 188–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119838230
Relación Tyler, Ralph W. (1948). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. In Basic principles of curriculum and instruction (2nd ed.).
Relación Ortiz, Elena. A., Bos, María Soledad, Peraza, Juliana C., Giambruno, Cecilia, Levin, Victoria, Oubiña, Victoria, Pineda, Jasmine Anne & Zoido, Pablo. (2024). Learning can’t Wait: Lessons for Latin America and the Caribbean from PISA 2022.
Relación Vargas, Diego J. H., Ojeda, Eliana C. C., Zapata, Andrea C., Flores, Karla A. A., Antonio, José, Vela, Héctor, & Espinoza, Yolanda E. D.. (2024.). Analysis of significant learning in Higher Education: Usefulness of Fink’s Taxonomy: A Systematic Review.
Relación Vaillant, Denise, & Manso, Juan. (2022). Formación inicial y carrera docente en América Latina: una mirada global y regional. Ciencia y Educación, 6(1), 109-118.
Relación Weimer, Maryellen. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Relación Whetten, David A. (2007). Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago. Journal of Management Education, 31(3), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906298445
Relación Wicker, Amanda. (2022). Rethinking education for the practitioner using Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning: Lessons learned in redesigning an introductory level doctoral course. Research Issues in Contemporary Education, 7(3).

Derechos Derechos de autor 2026 Revista ORATORES
Derechos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0